Smarter Tracing in Datadog: Service Reliability, Lower Costs

Capture Only the Traces You Need
Tail-sample to identify, send only important traces
Pay for only the traces you need
Improve Datadog APM while managing cost
Problem – Collecting the Right Traces While Managing Datadog APM Cost
Datadog APM is a powerful observability solution — and a top choice for distributed tracing. But as your system scales, so do two critical challenges: gaps in visibility and unexpected costs tied to Datadog pricing and billing models. Building resilient systems requires collecting the traces you need — and stop overpaying for data you don’t need. If you’ve ever asked:
- “Why can’t I see what happened inside that queue or async worker?”
- “Why is our Datadog bill growing faster than our infrastructure?”
- “Why does our tracing data still leave questions unanswered during an incident?”
You’re not alone. These are common signs that your Datadog APM tracing pipeline is due for smarter tracing and a more targeted approach — one focused on service reliability, data quality, and cost control.
At scale, even well-instrumented systems hit the same friction points:
- Head-Based Sampling Drops Critical Traces:
- Datadog trace sampling decisions are made too early — before knowing if a trace contains errors or high latency. That means slowdowns, retries, and failures often go unobserved.
- Trace Context Breaks Across Boundaries:
- Async jobs, message queues, and legacy systems frequently break context, resulting in fragmented Datadog trace search results.
- High-Cardinality Tags Drive Up Datadog Costs:
- Tags like user IDs, session tokens, or dynamic URLs increase unique time series and storage use. These high-cardinality metrics impact Datadog custom metrics and billing.“Why can’t I see what happened inside that queue or async worker?”
These aren’t minor annoyances — they increase Datadog APM pricing, add dashboard noise, and weaken incident response.
Solution – Smarter Tracing Without Replacing Datadog
ControlTheory enhances your existing Datadog APM setup to provide fine-grained control over what gets traced, sampled, and stored — so you get more value from every trace while reducing Datadog billing shocks.
Here’s how:
1. Tail-Based Sampling
Instead of making decisions at the start of a request, we wait until a trace completes using a technique called tail sampling. Tail-based sampling allows you to:
- Keep traces with errors, slowdowns, or retries
- Drop unimportant traffic
- Prioritize critical paths for training or debugging
This reduces ingestion costs and improves signal quality across your Datadog trace search for smarter tracing in Datadog APM.
2. Trace Consolidation
ControlTheory makes it possible to combine native Datadog traces with OpenTelemetry, eBPF, and LD_PRELOAD-based instrumentation, giving you a complete and unified view of system behavior:
- OpenTelemetry for flexible cross-platform instrumentation
- eBPF for container- and kernel-level insight without code changes
- LD_PRELOAD for auto-instrumenting legacy and third-party binaries
We stitch these together into complete, end-to-end Datadog-compatible traces — giving you full context even across async jobs, queues, and service boundaries.





3. Cardinality Management
ControlTheory helps reduce Datadog tracing and APM costs by managing tag explosion at the source. You can:
- Normalize or strip volatile high-cardinality fields
- Enrich only business-critical traces
- Prevent noisy tags from inflating Datadog custom metrics and logs
This keeps your dashboards clean and your Datadog billing predictable.
4. Intelligent Telemetry Pipelines Enable Smarter Tracing
ControlTheory acts as a telemetry control plane between your services and Datadog. With flexible pipelines, you can:
- Downsample low-value spans
- Filter or transform spans in-flight
- Send full-fidelity traces to cold storage (like S3)
- Route only actionable data into Datadog
This approach ensures observability ROI and cost-efficiency — not just more data ingestion.
The Outcome: Smarter Tracing – Just the Traces You Need, Controlled Cost, Confident Reliability
With ControlTheory and Datadog working together, you get:
- End-to-end visibility across modern and legacy systems
- Reduced Datadog pricing through cardinality control and sampling
- Better incident response with clean, actionable traces
- Smarter AI automation, thanks to high-quality telemetry
- Total control with policy-driven data pipelines
It’s the easiest way to improve Datadog trace search performance and reduce custom metric bloat — without leaving the Datadog platform.
Building Observability That Actually Works, Better
If you’re scaling your systems — and your observability spend — ControlTheory can help you shift from tracing chaos to clarity. Control Theory helps you:
- Get the right traces
- Maintain trace context
- Filter noise and reduce Datadog custom metrics
- Avoid Datadog cost surprises
- Improve reliability at scale
Build smarter tracing in Datadog that’s more affordable, with controllability from ControlTheory.